NAV: AutoBeta Home > AutoBeta Popular content >

unfair competition Learn more about unfair competition

AutoBeta has retrieved the following content about unfair competition for you across the entire web.

• 

  Guazi issued a public statement to apologize to the "rival" Renmin car.

  Guazi issued a statement on the official platform today apologizing to Renche. The dispute over unfair competition between Guazi and Renren has been concluded, and Guazi apologized for the impact of the unfair competition on Renren, the statement said. The specific contents are as follows: Beijing Renche used vehicle Brokerage Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Renche") sued many used motor vehicle brokers (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (2019 Beijing 0105 early Republic of China 8011 case) has now been concluded. Our company has caused the unfair competition involved in the judgment to Renmin car.

  Guazi 2021-06-25
• 

  Name it "wipe the edge"? Lingbao Motor responds to unfair Competition

  On May 24, Jiangsu Jimai New Energy vehicle Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Jimai New Energy") made a relevant explanation on the previous official letter issued by Changan Automobile. Jimai New Energy said that because it had not received written documents so far, it was unable to judge the authenticity of the official letter, so it explained the incident through the media. Lingbao car watch

  Automobiles Changan new energy models Changan automobiles products official letters improper unfair competition price market sequence behavior positioning writing 2022-05-26
• 

  This new power company is involved in unfair competition! Regulatory Authority: penalty

  According to the latest announcement of the Beijing Municipal Administration of Market Supervision, Haidian No. 1 Branch of Beijing Lai Automobile sales and Service Co., Ltd. was fined 200000 yuan for violating the Anti-unfair Competition Law of the people's Republic of China. The document number of the administrative penalty decision is Jinghai Supervisory punishment (2021) 934. After investigation, the party's original sales staff Liu Mou in order to increase sales performance, and have the intention to buy a car when the telephone communication, said that the party and the third party cooperation, car purchase signed a personal rental agreement, 3 years 43000, 5 years 63000, can contact to provide the use of license plate indicators, and provide a rental agreement template, but also provide personal friends channels to find indicators, 3 years.

  Weilai 2021-12-06
• 

  Verdict! Tesla's infringement case won a compensation of 300000 yuan!

  Recently, according to the official account of the Tianxin District people's Court in Changsha City, Tesla sued Tesla for trademark and copyright infringement of used cars in August last year. The court ruled in Tesla's favor and ruled that the defendant immediately stopped infringing upon the plaintiff's exclusive right to use the registered trademark, immediately stopped infringing upon the plaintiff's copyright, and established

  Tex Tesla trademark company used car behavior improper unfair competition logo court work defendant publicity same shop 2023-08-08
• 

  Is there confusion between UNI and Uni? Changan Motor sent a letter to Lingbao Motor demanding that the infringement be stopped.

  On May 20, an official letter from Changan Automobile demanding that unfair competition be stopped immediately was exposed online. The contents of the official letter show that Jiangsu Jimai New Energy vehicle Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Jimai New Energy") "Lingbao Automobile Uni listing Conference" series of advertisements, its use of advertising

  Cars Changan models Changan products sales volume sequence behavior price new energy improper unfair competition range official market 2022-05-20
• 

  Show intelligence? Tesla and Ford pickup tug of war, Ford responded unfairly

  Truss Cybertruck electric pickup truck has become a big online topic recently, with a total of 200000 orders so far, even though there are frequent complaints about its strange appearance, many fans are willing to pay for it. Cybertruck will compete for traditional American pick-up trucks such as Ford Fmur150, and Tesla says pickup models have barely changed their design style in the past few decades, and Cybertruck hopes to break that situation. In response, Tesla officially released a video of a tug-of-war between Cybertruck and Ford Fmur150. Musk said, "C.

  Tesla pickup Cybertruck 2019-11-26
• 

  Claim 1.2 million! The ideal car sued a film shop.

  Recently, ideal Automobile sued an ideal car film shop in Linyi, Shandong Province, with a claim of 1.2 million yuan, on the grounds that the ideal car film store infringed upon trademark rights and unfair competition. In May this year, the owner of a film shop in Linyi, Shandong Province received a civil complaint, the plaintiff

  Car ideal company film trademark name limited limited court behavior defendant amount Linyi one incorrect 2023-07-24
• 

  Lexus dealers are fined!

  Shenzhen Zhongsheng Lexus Motor Co., Ltd. was fined 500000 yuan for making false or misleading commercial propaganda about its products and violating the anti-unfair competition law, according to the national enterprise credit information publicity system. Shenzhen Supervisory punishment (2022) Ji 285 shows that the type of illegal behavior is: unfair competition.

  Sass Lake Brands cars sales luxury Market China Nidi models sales products domestic influence Honda 2022-12-17
• 

  Heavy! Jiangling refused to accept the judgment and appealed to the court, refusing to admit that Lu Feng X7 copied Land Rover.

  In March this year, Jaguar Land Rover eagerly announced a major news that the infringement case of Jiangling Holdings Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jiangling Company) was sued by the Chaoyang District people's Court in Beijing, China, and finally won after three years of litigation. The court ordered Jiangling to immediately stop the "unfair competition behavior" involved in the case, immediately stop production and sale of two specific Land Wind X7 models, issued a statement on the official website and media, and paid 1.5 million yuan in compensation to Jaguar Land Rover. We looked through the official website of Jiangling Company and Lufeng Motor and found no relevant statement about the lawsuit. On the contrary, Jiangling Motor Co., Ltd.

  2019-04-23
• 

  The old case is brought up! A brand was fined 87.61 million yuan

  On November 29, the Jiangsu Provincial higher people's Court and the Provincial Market Supervision Administration jointly held a press conference, at which they reported the judicial and law enforcement work of anti-monopoly and anti-unfair competition in Jiangsu Province from 2019 to 2022, and issued ten typical cases of anti-monopoly and anti-unfair competition enforcement. Among them, some

  Dealers cars prices sales markets Jiangsu competition behavior antitrust parties models quotations brands minimum 2022-12-01
• 

  The car media is ripping! The change of car was sued by Auto House.

  China's two media giants have officially "ripped off", saying that there is unfair competition in the exchange of cars, and Auto Home will take the change of cars to court. According to the latest case of the Haidian Court in Beijing, the plaintiff Beijing Automobile Home claimed that it was the owner and operator of the "Automobile Home" website platform and the mobile application "Automobile Home", and the main body of the operation of the Automobile Home Company in the country. "Automobile House" is not only the abbreviation of the plaintiff's enterprise name, but also the name of the website. at the same time, the words "Automobile House" and "Automobile House look at cars and buy cars" have also been registered as trademarks, and Beijing Automobile House Company is the trademark holder. The family of cars in Beijing.

  Home of cars 2020-06-16
• 

  Geely was hacked the worst time.

  Netizens revealed that it was unfair to put up propaganda posters attacking Geely in an independent brand car 4S store. The poster of the independent brand 4S store not only promoted its own brand, but also belittled Geely. The content shows that Geely started in refrigerator parts, although after years of development, its overall supplier system still stays in the rural workshop system, so the two are not on the same level in terms of brand. In fact, the major brand manufacturers have some sales skills for competitors, through the understanding of competitive models to find out deficiencies, grasp the handle of each other, to achieve the goal of "raising themselves and belittling others". However, the competition points.

  Cars Geely cars 2019-08-05
• 

  Auto House sued for a change of car, claiming economic loss of 1.18 million yuan.

  According to the official website of Haidian Court, because it is believed that the enterprise name "Automobile Home" was used by the "change car" software without authorization, Beijing Auto Home Information Technology Co., Ltd. sued Beijing E-car Information Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing E-car Interconnection Information Technology Co., Ltd., demanding that counterfeiting constitute unfair competition, stop counterfeiting immediately, publish a newspaper statement to eliminate the impact and compensate for economic losses and reasonable expenses totaling 1.183 million yuan. The plaintiff, Beijing Auto Home, alleges that it is the owner and operator of the Auto Home website platform and mobile application software Auto Home, and is the main body of the operation of the Auto Home company in China. "the car.

  Home of cars 2020-06-15
• 

  The promotion of a certain brand of black Geely was exposed, and the vice president of Geely: why can't you see others well?

  A few days ago, some netizens revealed that it was unfair to put up propaganda posters attacking Geely in an independent brand car 4S store. Geely responded today: evil words deceive the public, vicious attack. The poster content of the independent brand car 4S store shows that Geely started from refrigerator parts, although after years of development, its overall supplier system still stays in the rural workshop system, so the two are not on the same level in terms of brand. Yang Xueliang, vice president of Geely Group, responded through Weibo: "I don't think this is unfair, this is evil words to deceive the public, vicious attack!" Do they have any evidence that Geely's suppliers still make electric ice.

  Geely exposure President Brand 2019-08-06
• 

  A brand of black Geely advertised that it could not be confirmed, and now netizens found it in the toilet of the 4S store!

  A few days ago, netizens revealed that a poster compared with Geely had been put up in a 4S store. Geely's vice president said it was a malicious attack. After media reports, the head of SAIC Roewe's public relations department said he could not confirm the authenticity of the poster. Netizens went to the scene again today to see that the poster was affixed to the toilet. The poster content of the independent brand car 4S store shows that Geely started from refrigerator parts, although after years of development, its overall supplier system still stays in the rural workshop system, so the two are not on the same level in terms of brand. Yang Xueliang, vice president of Geely Group, responded through Weibo: "I don't think this is unfair, this is."

  2019-08-08
• 

  Tesla reduced the price of all the models, and the prospective owner gave up ES8 and chose Model 3.

  On March 1st, Tesla Guanxuan reduced the price of all the models, including 26000 yuan to 44000 yuan for Model 3, 11300 yuan to 277500 yuan for Model S and 174500 yuan to 341100 yuan for Model X. Among them, the price reduction of 341100 yuan is Model X P100D. Tesla Model 3 just began to be officially delivered in China a few days ago, and now the price of the car has dropped by tens of thousands. The owner who just picked up the car must have some ideas. After learning that the price of Model 3 has been reduced.

  Tesla 2019-03-02
• 

  Trademark infringement! Tesla sued a company for a compensation of 5 million yuan

  Recently, the verdict of Tesla v. "Tesla Beer" trademark infringement was announced, and the verdict was "reject the appeal and uphold the original verdict". In other words, Tesla won this case. According to reports, the court determined that the Tesla series of trademarks were well-known trademarks and sentenced the defendant Zhongyin Food Co., Ltd. ("Tesla Beer").

  Tex Tesla trademark beer judgment company court appeal infringement miscarriage original judgment brand limited limited consumer 2023-08-10
• 

  SWM Swaycar apologizes!

  What happened when SWM Swai sent an "apology" to its owner on Aug. 27th? As the quadrennial European Cup naturally has a high degree of popularity, enterprises also try their best to contact the official events in order to obtain market hot spots, but how to get market hot spots while making marketing just right, this is also a problem that enterprises need to consider. On June 16, Siwei Motors announced that if Italy wins the European Championship, it will receive a full refund of three places from users of Iron Man cars who have already picked up their cars. You can return.

  Swai car 2021-08-28
• 

  Heavyweight | Beijing Court ruled that Land Rover Aurora won, and production of the fake Land Wind X7 must be stopped.

  After three years of litigation, Jaguar Land Rover's lawsuit against Jiangling Land Rover finally came to a conclusion. Jiangling Land Rover lost the lawsuit, and Jaguar Land Rover won. Beijing Chaoyang District Court recently ruled that five designs of Lufeng X7 made by China Jiangling Motor directly copied the design of range Rover Aurora, causing confusion among consumers and ordered Jiangling to stop production immediately, Reuters reported. According to the court's ruling, the production, sales and marketing promotion of Lufeng X7 should be stopped immediately. More importantly, Jiangling must also pay compensation to Jaguar Land Rover, the exact amount of which has not been reported. The court is comparing the two cars.

  Cars Establishment Beijing Jaguar Land Rover models sales Litigation Design Investment response content Land Wind success finally first 2019-03-23
• 

  Honda sues Great Wall "Harvard H6" for plagiarism claim of 20 million, Great Wall denies the accusation

  In October 2017, Honda formally sued Great Wall for patent infringement, involving a Harvard H6, the second time Honda has sued a Chinese-owned car brand for infringement. On June 20, the above-mentioned case was formally heard in the Beijing intellectual property Court. According to the plaintiff Honda Technical Research Industry Co., Ltd., in 2007, the company obtained two patents for inventions entitled "the rear door structure of the vehicle" (No. 200710008273.0) and "the decoration installation structure of the vehicle" (No. 200710161631.1). Honda was in the Great Wall Motor Company in 2015.

  Great Wall Honda sue Harvard 2019-06-21